Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)
The MS ENERGY Flare X PRO is the stronger overall package here: more real power, more range potential, bigger wheels, and a noticeably better price-to-performance balance. It feels like a true "big-boy scooter" that just happens to be priced in the mid-range.
The BOESPORTS G9 PRO still makes sense if you want a softer, slightly more comfort-focused ride with a bit less intimidation from the motors and you care about 52 V simplicity over 60 V punch. It can work for a committed commuter who values comfort and isn't chasing max performance per euro.
If you want the most scooter for your money and don't mind the weight, look at the Flare X PRO first. If you're range-hungry but more conservative in your power expectations, the G9 PRO can still be justified.
Stick around for the full comparison - the devil, as always, is in the real-world riding details.
There's a certain point in an e-scooter rider's journey when the cute, folding city toy just doesn't cut it anymore. Your commute gets longer, your expectations higher, and suddenly you're shopping scooters that look suspiciously like small electric motorbikes.
The BOESPORTS G9 PRO and MS ENERGY Flare X PRO both live right at that point. On paper, they promise serious dual-motor performance, real-world commuting range, and the kind of suspension that doesn't make your spine question your life choices after a stretch of cobblestones.
One of them leans more into "over-specced commuter tank," the other into "budget muscle scooter that forgot it's supposed to be mid-range." Both claim to be "Pro". Only one really feels like it's cashing that cheque. Let's dig in.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters sit in the same broad class: heavy, dual-motor, long-range machines that are meant to replace a car or public transport for sizeable daily commutes. Think riders doing double-digit kilometres each way, often with hills, dodgy tarmac, and the occasional detour onto gravel.
The BOESPORTS G9 PRO aims for the "serious commuter" vibe: chunky 10-inch, wide tyres, big battery, full suspension, and a stance that says "I'm not folding myself onto the metro, I am the metro." It's built to feel substantial and confidence-inspiring rather than wild.
The MS ENERGY Flare X PRO, meanwhile, flirts openly with the "mini electric motorbike" category. Bigger wheels, beefier voltage, longer-range battery options, and styling that looks more weekend trail ride than Tuesday commute.
Price-wise, they collide head-on: the G9 PRO sits higher, but the Flare X PRO undercuts it while offering more on paper. That alone makes the comparison unavoidable - one of them is clearly punching above its ticket, and the other has to work harder to justify its price.
Design & Build Quality
Pick up (or rather, try to pick up) the G9 PRO and the first impression is "massive slab of aluminium." The chassis feels robust, welds look clean, and the whole thing gives off a "built in a factory that also does industrial shelving" vibe. It's more functional than pretty, with an industrial-chic look, wide tyres and a straightforward folding stem that, to its credit, doesn't feel flimsy.
The Flare X PRO, by contrast, looks like someone took a downhill e-bike and trimmed off the bits they didn't need. The exposed C-type suspension arms, colour accents (gold/black or orange/black), and 11-inch wheels give it a more purposeful, "engineered" presence. The cockpit is neater, the deck rubber grippy, and the whole frame feels a notch more integrated rather than just "big and strong."
In the hands, the G9 PRO communicates solidity, but also a touch of generic OEM DNA - like a very decent platform that's been specced up rather than engineered from scratch. The Flare X PRO feels more like a coherent product: stronger brand identity, better visual balance, and fewer little things that make you think "ah yes, I've seen that exact part on five other scooters."
Both are sturdy; the Flare simply feels more sorted and deliberate, especially considering it's the cheaper of the two.
Ride Comfort & Handling
On bumpy city streets, the G9 PRO does a good job of pretending your local council actually maintains the roads. The combination of full spring suspension and fat 10-inch tubeless tyres means it sails over rough asphalt and the typical patchwork of manhole covers and cracks. The suspension tuning is on the softer side, so you get that cushy, slightly floaty feel - pleasant for commuting, less sharp for aggressive riding.
Handlebars are at a comfortable height, the deck is generously wide, and foot placement is relaxed. After a long stretch of cobbles, your knees and wrists are still on speaking terms, which is more than can be said for half the so-called "urban" scooters out there.
Then you get on the Flare X PRO and the game moves up a half-step. The dual C-suspension has more travel and feels more controlled: soft enough to soak up nasty hits, but without that vague pogo-stick rebound you sometimes feel on budget spring setups. Paired with taller 11-inch tyres, it feels more stable at speed and more forgiving if you misjudge a pothole or jump onto a curb cut at a bad angle.
On long rides, the Flare X PRO stays calmer under you. The bigger wheels give more confidence over gaps, tram tracks and chunky gravel, and the scooter simply tracks straighter when the surface gets sketchy. The G9 PRO is comfortable; the Flare is comfortable and more planted.
Performance
Both scooters are legally capped to polite city speeds, but under the skin they're very different animals.
The G9 PRO's dual motors give you a strong, predictable shove off the line. Acceleration is brisk enough to put rental scooters in your rear-view instantly, and hills that murder single-motor commuters suddenly become "oh, that's cute." Power delivery is smooth - the FOC controller keeps things civilised, and there's no obnoxious motor whine. In everyday traffic, you feel like you've always got headroom; the scooter never seems stressed.
The Flare X PRO, though, doesn't merely accelerate - it feels like it's impatient. With higher-voltage architecture and more rated power, it has a punchier launch, especially in dual-motor mode. Steep climbs that slow the G9 PRO noticeably are dispatched with more authority here. You feel the extra grunt in your legs and in how little the scooter cares about your weight or a loaded backpack.
Braking is strong on both. The G9 PRO's dual hydraulic discs are genuinely good - lever feel is progressive, and you can scrub off speed quickly without drama. The Flare X PRO matches that with its own hydraulics and then goes one better: its variable regenerative braking lets you control descents mostly with the motors, saving pads and fingers, and giving you that reassuring "engine braking" sensation.
At their limited top speed both are composed, but the Flare's combination of bigger wheels and stiffer chassis gives you more confidence to stay at that speed on less-than-perfect surfaces. The G9 PRO feels fine up to its cap, but push into rougher territory and you're more aware of its shorter wheels and softer setup.
Battery & Range
On paper, the G9 PRO has a substantial battery, and in the real world it does deliver legitimately long commutes. Ride it sensibly - mixed single/dual-motor use, normal city speeds, a bit of stop-start - and you're comfortably in that "several days of commuting before you're forced to charge" territory. Range claims from the brand are, predictably, optimistic, but even when you knock them down to reality, it still counts as a long-range scooter.
Crank both motors constantly and ride it like you're late to everything in life, and you'll watch the percentage drop, but you're still not panicking halfway home. Voltage sag is reasonably well-managed; it doesn't turn into a dying sloth when the battery dips.
The Flare X PRO, especially in the larger battery configuration, plays in a different league. Even after applying the usual "manufacturer fantasy tax" to the claimed numbers, you're looking at the sort of range where many riders will be charging once or twice a week, not every other night. For longer commutes, countryside rides or weekend trail exploring, that extra buffer is very noticeable.
Charging times are surprisingly similar despite the Flare carrying more juice, which tells you the charging system is a bit more assertive. The G9 PRO's slower charge is kinder on the cells but demands more planning if you're a heavy daily user. With the Flare, it's easier to top up meaningfully during a workday or long lunch.
In practical terms: the G9 PRO offers "adequate-to-good" long-range commuting. The Flare X PRO offers genuine "forget-about-it" range for most users in this class.
Portability & Practicality
Let's not sugarcoat it: neither of these is a nimble little shoulder-sling commuter. They're both heavy lumps of metal and lithium.
The G9 PRO, at over forty kilos, is a "wheel it, don't lift it" machine. The folding joint itself is solid and the fold-and-clip system works well enough, but the moment you try to actually carry it up stairs, you realise the only thing "portable" about it is the fact it technically has hinges. If you've got a ground-floor garage, lift, or a spot in the hallway, it's manageable. If you live on the fourth floor with no lift - start lifting kettlebells now.
The Flare X PRO is slightly lighter on the scales but still firmly in the "no, you're not carrying this onto a tram" category. Its double-locking stem and bulkier front end make it feel even more like small motorbike hardware. Folded, it's long and tall rather than compact-cute, but it slots into a car boot reasonably well if you're not trying to share space with a family's worth of luggage.
Day-to-day practicality therefore hinges more on your storage and lifestyle than on the tiny weight difference. Both are daily riders, not multi-modal toys. The Flare's edge in range, stability and performance means you're more likely to actually treat it like a car substitute; the G9 PRO can do that too, but feels slightly more like a big, heavy commuter than a genuine all-rounder.
Safety
In the braking department, both scooters do what this class absolutely must: hydraulic discs front and rear. The G9 PRO's system feels strong and progressive, with enough bite to haul down its weight plus rider quickly, even on emergency stops. It's a clear step up from mechanical setups you still (sadly) see on some "performance" machines.
The Flare X PRO matches that braking power and then layers regenerative braking on top. Being able to slow using the motors before you even touch the levers is not just energy-efficient - it smooths out your riding and takes some strain off your hands on long descents. It's particularly nice if your commute includes sustained downhills where mechanical brakes alone tend to heat and fade.
Lighting on the G9 PRO is good in the commuter sense: bright front light, rear light with brake function, and those side lights that do a surprisingly good job of carving a little luminous bubble around you in city traffic. You feel reasonably visible, especially at junctions.
The Flare X PRO adds integrated turn signals, which is one of those features you didn't think you needed until you ride with them and then hate going back. Being able to signal without removing a hand from the bar in busy traffic is no small thing. Its front light is strong, and the larger stance plus higher deck give a slightly more commanding presence in traffic.
Tyre grip and stability? The G9 PRO's wide 10-inch tyres feel grippy and forgiving, especially on wet city paint and patched tarmac. The Flare's bigger 11-inch rubber simply gives you a wider safety window - less chance of being caught by a pothole edge, more stability at its limited top speed and better composure if you stray onto gravel or dirt.
Both have reasonable water protection for light rain. Neither is a submarine; both will handle "British drizzle plus puddles" fine if you're not reckless.
Community Feedback
| BOESPORTS G9 PRO | MS ENERGY Flare X PRO |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
This is where things get awkward for the G9 PRO.
The BOESPORTS asks a respectably serious chunk of money for its spec: dual motors, big 52 V battery, hydraulic brakes, full suspension. Taken in isolation, that doesn't sound unfair. But then the Flare X PRO strolls in, offers more voltage, more available battery capacity, more power and bigger wheels - for noticeably less cash.
Per euro, the Flare X PRO simply delivers more: more hill-eating torque, more range ceiling, more safety tech (regen, indicators), and a stronger overall chassis feel. The G9 PRO lands in that slightly uncomfortable middle ground where you're paying close to "proper performance" money but not quite getting the same overall package.
If you find the G9 PRO at a deep discount or bundled with good local support, it becomes more palatable. At its typical street price versus the Flare's, it's hard to make a cold, rational argument for choosing it on value alone.
Service & Parts Availability
BOESPORTS operates largely as a value/performance brand with European distribution. There are warehouses and parts around, and you can get spares, but you are dealing with what is, effectively, an up-specced generic platform. That means certain parts are easy to source from multiple channels, but also that you're relying more on retailer competence than a deep, established after-sales ecosystem.
MS ENERGY, on the other hand, has been carving out a more formal presence in the European e-mobility scene, particularly around its Flare and Urban series. Feedback suggests a reasonably solid network for parts and service, and the brand itself markets serviceability and Smart BMS support as selling points, not afterthoughts.
For a heavy-use commuter doing serious mileage, having a clearer brand-backed path to spares and repairs tilts things in favour of the Flare X PRO. The G9 PRO is not unserviceable by any stretch, but it doesn't inspire quite the same long-term confidence in structured support.
Pros & Cons Summary
| BOESPORTS G9 PRO | MS ENERGY Flare X PRO |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | BOESPORTS G9 PRO | MS ENERGY Flare X PRO (30 Ah) |
|---|---|---|
| Motor power (rated) | 2 x 1.000 W (2.000 W) | 2 x 1.200 W (2.400 W) |
| Top speed (limited) | 25 km/h | 25 km/h |
| Battery | 52 V 21 Ah (1.092 Wh) | 60 V 30 Ah (1.800 Wh) |
| Claimed range | 70 km stated | 135 km stated |
| Real-world range (est.) | 45-55 km | 70-90 km |
| Weight | 42 kg | 38 kg |
| Brakes | Dual hydraulic discs | Hydraulic discs + regen brake |
| Suspension | Front & rear spring | Dual C-suspension front & rear |
| Tyres | 10 x 3,5 inch, tubeless | 11 inch, pneumatic tubeless |
| Max load | 120 kg | 130 kg |
| Water resistance | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Charging time | 6-8 h | 6-7,5 h |
| Price | 1.185 € | 949 € |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
Both scooters belong firmly in the "serious machine" camp. They're not toys, they're not entry-level, and they will absolutely annihilate the average rental scooter. But standing them side by side, the MS ENERGY Flare X PRO simply feels like the more complete, better-balanced proposition.
The Flare gives you more power, more real range, larger wheels, better safety tech, and a more cohesive design - all while asking for less of your bank account. It's the one that feels like it can handle brutal daily commutes, weekend exploring, and still have enough headroom that you won't be shopping for an upgrade after six months.
The BOESPORTS G9 PRO can still make sense if you prioritise a softer, very comfy ride, like the feel of its wide 10-inch setup, or you find it at a price low enough to close the value gap. For a rider who wants a big, cushy, straightforward long-range scooter and isn't obsessed with squeezing every last watt and kilometre out of their money, it will do the job.
But if you're choosing with your riding brain rather than your heart, the Flare X PRO is the one that better justifies calling itself "Pro."
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | BOESPORTS G9 PRO | MS ENERGY Flare X PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (€/Wh) | ❌ 1,09 €/Wh | ✅ 0,53 €/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) | ❌ 47,40 €/km/h | ✅ 37,96 €/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | ❌ 38,46 g/Wh | ✅ 21,11 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | ❌ 1,68 kg/km/h | ✅ 1,52 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (€/km) | ❌ 23,70 €/km | ✅ 11,86 €/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | ❌ 0,84 kg/km | ✅ 0,48 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | ✅ 21,84 Wh/km | ❌ 22,50 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | ❌ 80,00 W/km/h | ✅ 96,00 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | ❌ 0,0210 kg/W | ✅ 0,0158 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | ❌ 156,00 W | ✅ 266,67 W |
These metrics answer different "numbers geek" questions: how much battery and speed you get for your money, how efficiently each scooter turns weight and watt-hours into real-world range, how powerful the drivetrain is relative to its limited top speed, and how quickly you can put energy back into the pack. Lower values generally mean better efficiency or better value, while the two "higher wins" metrics highlight raw performance and charging aggressiveness.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | BOESPORTS G9 PRO | MS ENERGY Flare X PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | ❌ Heavier, worse for stairs | ✅ Slightly lighter, still heavy |
| Range | ❌ Good but shorter | ✅ Clearly longer real range |
| Max Speed (limited) | ✅ Equal, feels composed | ✅ Equal, very stable |
| Power | ❌ Less punchy motors | ✅ Stronger dual motors |
| Battery Size | ❌ Smaller capacity pack | ✅ Much larger pack |
| Suspension | ❌ Softer, less controlled | ✅ C-suspension more refined |
| Design | ❌ Generic industrial look | ✅ Cohesive, purposeful styling |
| Safety | ❌ Lacks indicators, regen | ✅ Indicators, regen, stable |
| Practicality | ❌ Heavier, bulky folded | ✅ Better range, similar bulk |
| Comfort | ✅ Very plush on bad roads | ✅ Plush, more controlled |
| Features | ❌ Fewer standout extras | ✅ Regen, signals, app tuning |
| Serviceability | ❌ More generic, less clear | ✅ Brand emphasises service |
| Customer Support | ❌ Adequate but basic | ✅ Stronger EU presence |
| Fun Factor | ❌ Solid but not thrilling | ✅ More grin per throttle |
| Build Quality | ❌ Solid yet a bit rough | ✅ Feels tighter, more refined |
| Component Quality | ❌ Decent mid-tier parts | ✅ Better matched hardware |
| Brand Name | ❌ Less recognised, generic | ✅ Stronger, growing brand |
| Community | ❌ Smaller, more niche | ✅ Wider enthusiast base |
| Lights (visibility) | ✅ Good, nice side lights | ✅ Good, plus indicators |
| Lights (illumination) | ❌ Adequate commuter beam | ✅ Stronger, better spread |
| Acceleration | ❌ Quick but milder | ✅ Noticeably harder launch |
| Arrive with smile factor | ❌ Competent, not exciting | ✅ Consistently entertaining |
| Arrive relaxed factor | ✅ Very mellow, comfy | ✅ Comfortable, still relaxed |
| Charging speed | ❌ Slower average refill | ✅ Faster for bigger pack |
| Reliability | ❌ Feels more generic OEM | ✅ Better-engineered platform |
| Folded practicality | ❌ Bulky, heavy to move | ❌ Also bulky and heavy |
| Ease of transport | ❌ Worst due to extra kilos | ✅ Slightly easier to wrestle |
| Handling | ❌ Good but less precise | ✅ More planted, confident |
| Braking performance | ❌ Strong, but no regen | ✅ Strong plus regen control |
| Riding position | ✅ Upright, comfortable stance | ✅ Stable, natural stance |
| Handlebar quality | ❌ Functional, slightly basic | ✅ Better cockpit execution |
| Throttle response | ✅ Smooth, beginner-friendly | ❌ Abrupt in sport by default |
| Dashboard/Display | ❌ Standard, nothing special | ✅ Colour display, more info |
| Security (locking) | ❌ No clear advantage | ❌ No clear advantage |
| Weather protection | ✅ IP54, decent for rain | ✅ IPX4, decent as well |
| Resale value | ❌ Weaker brand recognition | ✅ Easier to resell |
| Tuning potential | ✅ Common platform, moddable | ✅ Strong controller, battery |
| Ease of maintenance | ❌ Less structured parts path | ✅ Better parts availability |
| Value for Money | ❌ Outgunned at its price | ✅ Excellent spec for cost |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the BOESPORTS G9 PRO scores 1 point against the MS ENERGY Flare X PRO's 9. In the Author's Category Battle, the BOESPORTS G9 PRO gets 8 ✅ versus 36 ✅ for MS ENERGY Flare X PRO (with a few ties sprinkled in).
Totals: BOESPORTS G9 PRO scores 9, MS ENERGY Flare X PRO scores 45.
Based on the scoring, the MS ENERGY Flare X PRO is our overall winner. In everyday use, the MS ENERGY Flare X PRO simply feels like the scooter that shows up, does everything you ask of it, and still has enough in reserve to keep you grinning on the ride home. It feels more thought-through, more mature, and more rewarding to live with if you actually ride hard and far. The BOESPORTS G9 PRO isn't a bad machine; it's just outclassed here. It delivers a comfy, capable commute, but beside the Flare X PRO it feels a touch overpriced and undercooked. If you want the scooter that will keep you satisfied the longest, the Flare is the one that really earns its "Pro" badge.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

